The Crossley ID Guide...some additional thoughts

Aside from the purpose and intent of Crossley's ID Guide mentioned in my previous post...

...Here are some things I really like about this bird guide:

1.  The Size Guide - shows bird families together on one page, pictured by relative size.  What a great way to focus on and learn overall size and shape.  Size guides like this are especially helpful for species like gulls.

2.  The best Bird Topography guide I have ever seen.  On four pages, Crossley uses eleven different birds to point out all the parts and pieces.  Most guides only have one or two birds depicted - obligatorily squeezed onto a page.  (Stokes does have nine species on six pages, which is also really well done.)

(click to enlarge)

3.  This guide contains more images of birds than any other to date.  Birds are depicted in close-ups and varying distances, even to specs in the sky.  This is very helpful.

4.  Birds are depicted in probable habitat scenarios.  You can see how they perch, fly, wade, or feed in a natural setting.  This may not be accurate across a birds entire range, but good enough to convey the idea.

5.  Each bird photo shown is there for a reason.  Richard, or his staff, have taken the time to crop and manipulate each bird image.  They wouldn't have gone to the effort without something to teach by each one.  It is up to us to figure out what we can learn from it.  Sometimes another species shown on the same page.  It helps you understand the proportions and relative size.

6.  Crossley doesn't include much in the way of vocalizations, and he even says he ended up including more than he originally intended to.  I agree with Crossley that trying to teach vocalizations through a field guide is of little or no use.  The most effective method I have participated in for learning bird vocalizations was in John C. Robinson's webinars.  He would show his written out mnemonic, sing/say it how he knows it, then play a recording of the real bird call.  Only then was I able to learn the vocalization and see how I could apply it myself in the field.  Now this method of teaching mnemonic and bird vocalizations could be done in a digital format.

Some things I'd like to see improved on the next edition:

1.  Maps - the maps are pretty good, but I still prefer Sibley's map showing migration.  I am still hoping for all field guide creators to use a uniform system for color coding.  I am also still anxious for the day that a field guide author says "I used eBird data to help me create the range maps".

2.  It's kind of weird seeing photos of people in a field guide.  I figure Crossley was paying homage to a few old birding friends or something by including them in the backgrounds.  Its just weird!  (Since writing that, I have heard and read that one dude was a stranger he had known all of 20 minutes, and his daughters are in there too.  Who are the guys on the boat?)

(click to enlarge)

3.  Okay, so maybe a few plates are a little too busy or the background is too strong for my eyes to concentrate, for example the Rufous Hummingbird.  Crossley did say he was going after reality and the reality of nature is that the background can sometimes be busy.  Regardless, I think the plates are eye-catching and artistic and beg me to stare and study them.

4.  I love Rick Wright's idea of making this a digital guide.  I see it being a perfect tool for things like the iPad or other similar tablets.  Cell phone apps would probably be too small to be really useful as a workbook.  Crossley mentioned in his interview on the BirdChick podcast that he one day sees video-ID Giudes.  I could totally see that on an iPad.  Wouldn't that be cool!

Conclusion:


I really enjoy this new take on teaching birding skills through a workbook scenario.  The Crossley ID Guide is beautiful, captivating, and a real gem.  You'd better hurry up and get one now and bone up on those warblers!